Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Most conflicts stem from varying imports or added functions and a
take-both approach merges them. A notable exception is theorem-2, where
a new result sequence-cong was required. Apart from that, theorem-2
could be taken almost verbatim from feature-delete albeit its type
coming from feature-decsetoid.
Conflicts:
Bidir.agda
FinMap.agda
Generic.agda
Precond.agda
|
|
|
|
The old definition of bff had a single failure mode - assoc - and its
proof was a single cong. Now we need to show that the other failure mode
- mapM (flip lookupM ...) - is eliminated by the success of the former
resulting in a larger proof.
|
|
Since the generalization of lemma-checkInsert-restrict there is nothing
to show for theorem-1. So everything works with Setoids now yielding the
same results as the paper proofs.
|
|
This is another step towards permitting arbitrary Setoids in bff.
|
|
The union was the only user of this type and now it uses only partial
mappings. So drop remaining uses of FinMap and make everything work with
FinMapMaybe instead.
|
|
In the presence of shape-changing updates, bff needs to shrink one of
the mappings before unifying them. As long the shape does not change,
the union becomes a disjoint union. With this insight we can adapt the
proof of theorem-1 using the adapted lemma-disjoint-union. Unfortunately
theorem-2 requires more work and assoc-enough becomes non-trivial due to
the introduction of mapMV.
|
|
Also rename fmap to _<$>_ to match Agda naming conventions. The imported
_>>=_ appears to have different binding, so some braces were necessary.
|
|
This removes imports.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suggested by Joachim Breitner.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Also adapt depending modules. Long lines generally become shorter. The
misleading name "EqInst" (hiding the decidability) got discarded.
|
|
And update Bidir and Precond, cause they import BFF.
|
|
The import of CheckInsert was broken in previous commit.
|
|
|
|
This way of naming things is more similar to the standard library and to
my own \::-injective. Suggested by Andres Loeh.
|
|
If get on Fin results in Vecs whose elements are unique, then theorem-2
can be applied.
|